Describe the transatlantic slave trade essay

HubPages»

Books, Literature, and Writing

Robert Frost – « Fire and Ice » Analysis

Updated on December 11, 2013 Scosgrove more Robert Frost’s Poems Buy The Elemental Median

To lose in order to freeze? Thatrrrs the true question resulting from Robert Frost in the 1923 rhetorically entitled poem, “Fire and Ice.” Frost talks about the world’s destruction as performed with the voices of doomsayers through the history of the world.

The poem shows an evaluation of two simple opposites of primal factors that will by their nature result in the same finish result. The unavoidable results of dying will occur whatever the path it has to take, whether it is to lose brightly and finish all of a sudden inside a flame of desire in order to be gradually and inextricably cooled and destroyed by ice. Frost’s utilization of metaphors, opposite comparisons, and the trademark utilization of nature like a dynamic pressure are on masterful display within this poem.

Frost, like numerous others, displays an affection for that embers of desire. In the opinion, he’d prefer to have resided a fiery and significant existence and gone out on a single note, instead of suffering the slow defeat of the withering and frosty grave.

He makes use of a metaphor that’s simple, yet terribly good at this context. Generally, desire happens to be referred to as a unique emotion, something which happens rapidly or perhaps in as soon as, similar to a flame erupting from the match. Frost makes use of this metaphor advantageously within this poem to explain his preferred method of the apocalypse. Once the finish comes, he’d rather it’s sudden and without remorse.

Fire, in the past happens to be referred to as passionate or loving. In “Fire and Ice,” he relates it to desire (which matches together with being passionate), but in general he turns it into something terribly destructive. I believe using desire as being a definite all-encompassing destructive metaphor adds a particular hint irony towards the poem as you wouldn’t generally relate desire like a destructive pressure. Another metaphor proven is hate, that is characterised through the ice, something which is developed and nurtured during a period of time gradually consuming whatever it comes down across. Again he makes use of something which is popularly used the readers would usually consider terms for example someone being coldhearted, coldblooded, cold as ice, etc… many of these terms define someone in which there isn’t much love within their existence. Frost certainly sees the effective nature of ice as something terrifying and awful. The metaphor of hate being ice emits some strong feelings in the readers because honestly, who may wish to finish everything in hate?

What Frost is attempting to complete with these metaphors is he’s attempting to lead the readers to simply accept and accept his opinion more than one they’ve already formerly formulated. The metaphors also bring the forces of those elements into something which hits just a little nearer to home for that readers – human feelings. Everybody at some point has felt whether desire to have something or perhaps a hate for something to see the planet finish in one of these simple two feelings causes it to be just a little clearer for that readers to know just precisely what they’re coping with. It may also help the two feelings and natural forces will work as opposing forces.

Frost’s method of evaluating opposites can often be a dangerous method, particularly when he essentially states that you could either chose left or right, but you’re likely to finish up in the same location. He begins the poem using the first line presenting fire and letting the readers understand what the poem is all about by telling us that many people like the opinion that fire is how a world will finish.

The 2nd line is available in presenting ice, letting the readers realize that many people will like the opposite to line one. Frost then allows us to in on which exactly it’s we’re coping with whenever we talk about fire and ice. Lined up three, he states he has felt desire in the existence and follows it lined up four by dubbing desire the metaphor for fire. Line five is really a connecting line backward and forward opposites. He continues lined up six by beginning from the metaphor for ice, letting the readers be aware of he’s also felt enough hate in the existence (hate to be the metaphor for ice). In lines seven and eight, Frost allows us to realize that this type of destruction can also be a terrific way to finish it.

Within the ninth line, he states that ice may also suffice for that apocalypse. He ties the 2 opposites together by telling us it does not matter which course we take, the finish result would be the same.

This now adds another layer to another opposites within the poem, desire and hate. Is Frost stating that no matter which of those we’re feeling, they’ll both result in the same finish? Among the definitions for desire is, “to want strongly,” whereas confirmed definition for hate is, “the emotion of intense dislike.” Another definition for desire is, “the feeling that comes with an unsatisfied condition.” It’s not quite brain surgery to consider a thief would best essay writing service australia intensely dislike an unsatisfied condition, though if somebody usually thinks about desire, they’d lean more toward the very first definition.

In my opinion with regard to this poem that Frost is leaning more towards this second definition for desire when drawing the ending consequence of his comparison on his opposites. The poem uses the context from the word differently because the readers continues with the poem to be able to draw its conclusion that desire and hate will both conclude exactly the same. It’s a fascinating, yet very deep method of conveying his message cheap it will make both natural spectrum and also the metaphor oppose one another is simply an unquestionably brilliant literary technique.

A different way to consider the words is always to pose an issue towards the metaphor: A wishOrhate for which? The solutions aren’t clearly mentioned within the poem, therefore the ambiguity leaves the readers to formulate their very own interpretation. Since it’s really left to the readers to interpret their very own desires and hates, a feeling of ambiguity the poem delivers reveals for an even bigger audience.

Though using the perfect circle that forms in the rods, it’s possible to only think that the need isn’t really as great as it’s chocked as much as be. For example, when the desire was really a wish for power, a wish for dying, a wish for terror, then out of the blue the poem will get a totally different read. If this point is introduced up, to suit the opposites mold, the hate could really be considered a hate for something terrible (a hate for genocide, a hate for racism), as the desire points within the same direction.

This, though, could leave Robert Frost themself in the cold as they say, since he initially sides with fire/desire before coming the final outcome it really doesn’t really matter. It’s interesting to consider the endless options this poem has due to its feeling of ambiguity. He’s really just selecting the way to achieve his finish with the opposite forces and justifying it with the metaphor.

Another look at the opposing forces could be within the voice from the poem (Frost) and who his audience is. If the poem is perfect for the crowd who (all metaphor aside) would prefer to begin to see the world finish in ice, Frost attempts to disadvantage the opposing readers into altering their opinion to see their own. The metaphor relates the term hate with ice and need with fire. Of these two, the unsuspecting readers will instantly consider wish to be the greater choice of these two and can affiliate with Frost, although the finish result remains the same. Even if his poem handles opposition, he is trying to get rid of the opposition to his argument and when the readers still decides to finish it in hate, then so whether it is.

The alternative natural forces, fire and ice, when stripped from the metaphor continue to be both full forces of destruction when left untamed. Forest fires, the ice-age, explosions, hypothermia, third degree burns, frostbite.

Many of these terrible terms have something in keeping. They all are associated with a destructive pressure. They all are also brought on by the 2 natural forces within this poem: fire and ice.

Throughout his career, Robert Frost ongoing to create concerning the forces of nature. He tends to bring up something very easy and adds major depth through it by evaluating natural pressure to some human emotion or personifying it. Frost’s perception on natural forces was there are two sides to the way the Earth or even the world labored, good and evil. Within this poem, Frost examines two evil sides from the naturalistic forces. Through the history of the world, there has been many catastrophic occasions which have nearly eliminated all existence.

There’s been four or five “Ice Ages” within the Earth’s history, using the earliest one hypothesized at happening around 2.7 to two.3 billion years back. Roughly 20,000 years back, our planet endured through its last Ice Age. This can be a known fact, and Frost exhibits his fear around the globe ending again within this means by his poem. Our Planet works the actual way it will, whether we would like it to or otherwise.

It lives and breathes much like average folks and typically, we’ve no control of this (anthropogenic global warming aside). To this day, people think that our planet is going to be consumed by fire. Among the scares for the entire 2012 (the conjecture the world will finish this year) ordeal is the fact that fire will take in the Earth.

These aren’t exactly new ideas either! In lots of world religions, fire varies from being symbolic of enlightenment to being symbolic of terror. In this way, Frost’s poem opens itself to an array of interpretations along with a grander audience.

Another helpful aside to presenting natural forces within this poem is always that in general, humans fear so much the apocalypse so we really can’t be too certain it won’t finish inside a natural disaster. At any time, our planet may go through certainly one of its cycles, getting raging fires through volcanoes, ozone depletion, or lighting strikes or it might run cycle through another ice age, getting cold and darkness over the Earth. Using personifying these natural forces with evil and invoking the finish around the globe within this poem is extremely effective also it does make the readers to consider (although rather morbidly) about meaning they’d decide to achieve exactly the same destination.

Robert Frost’s poem “Fire and Ice” is an extremely interesting poem indeed.

It pulls the strings on human feelings by getting us to consider the way we may wish to endure the finish around the globe. By utilizing two natural forces and assigning each a metaphor, he methods the neutral readers into focusing more about his side from the question, instead of opposing him. His effective utilization of metaphor within this poem relating the finish around the globe in fire to desire along with a bone chilling apocalypse of ice to hate resonates through the body, particularly when the readers really visualizes the big event happening both in manners.

Using nature like a definite evil also emits some emotion in the readers as it’s known that despite the fact that within our lifetime, the planet hasn’t tried to cycle with an ice age or perhaps a fire storm, it’s tried it before which is fully able to do it again. This is exactly what causes us to be want to choose from fire and ice within the poem. Also, the reader’s option is further enhanced with the feeling of ambiguity within the metaphor. Whenever we consider just what it would be that the readers desires or hates, the poem can perform a complete a hundred and 80 degree turn and make completely different feelings for each readers on each and every read.

Even though the finish result is identical, “Fire and Ice” raises ideas and feelings from the readers that aren’t casually considered by using his metaphor, opposing forces, and natural destruction.

Write for Hubpages

If you’d like to generate money writing for Hubpages, register here.

Related

Poems height:75px » class= »thumbphoto »>Poems height:75px » class= »thumbphoto »>Dramatic PoetryYou Is while you Promise

by Nida Ormo0

Dramatic PoetryAll I See Is That You Simply

by Nida Ormo2

OdeThe Ode: Definition, Types display: none »>sendinghey 24 months ago

great poem but what’s the primary idea? should you look at this please respond

smga22 five years ago from Dhaka, Bangladesh

Thank you for this nice hub

alireza five years ago

fantastic poet to see!

tommy five years ago

ya man! congrats

rjasp five years ago

Which was simply beautiful. how can you even develop a lot of variations? Totally awesome!

pimpdaddyk five years ago

awesome dude!

susan beck five years ago from drexel hill,pa

Good subject- great poem. Wanted to set up my two cents: Frost states he’s « sampled of desire » only « knows » of hate- he figures more and more people will probably desire something rather than hate it, thus growing the chance that some desires ( power and cash) can certainly turn sinister and be harmful( and that’s why he holds with individuals who favor fire.) Due to that, the fireplace which he speaks is more prone to be nuclear instead of volcanic.

Ice however,to be the opposite element, could describe the quality of cold indifference essential for hate and evil to exist on the planet. That sort of ice might cause the person-made fiery finish he predicts, as fast as desire could, making fire the greater choice once more. I don’t think he’s speaking a good ice age around a time of human indifference precipitating cataclysmic effects.

Only a thought. Thank you for discussing yours:)

Steele

Tina five years ago

The scriptures repeat the world will finish in fire, so

To be sure with Robert Frost